Ranked #1 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.8★ from 401 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
20 intellectual property lawyers ranked by LFR ScoreUpdated 0 paid placements in this rankingHow we rank →
Highest LFR Score in Hanover: Thoughts to Paper, LFR Score 63/100; 4.8★ from 401 Google reviews; open evenings.
Open 24 hours (per Google): Patent Insider, posts 24/7 hours; ranked #3 of 20.
Most-reviewed: Garcia Zamor, 99 Google reviews at 5.0★, the most of 20 ranked after Thoughts to Paper; ranked #2.
Rankings can't be bought. Lawyers can't pay to change their rank or score. How we rank
20 Hanover intellectual property lawyers are ranked here by LFR Score, from nine published factors. 1 is open 24/7, 3 open Saturdays and 2 open Sundays, based on posted hours. The median Google rating is 4.9★ across 20 rated law firms.
Ranked by our published LFR Score from public data, not by payment; a rank is not an endorsement or a prediction of results.
| Rank | Business | LFR Score | Google rating | Based in | Hours | Notable for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thoughts to Paper | 63 | 4.8★ (401) | Germantown, 45 mi away | Evenings | Top score |
| 2 | Garcia Zamor | 61 | 5.0★ (99) | Columbia, 39 mi away | — | Most reviews |
| 3 | Patent Insider | 60 | 5.0★ (7) | Baltimore, 41 mi away | Open 24 hrs (Google) | Open 24 hours |
| 4 | Baltimore Trademark Attorney | 58 | 4.9★ (84) | Baltimore, 41 mi away | Sat · Sun | — |
| 5 | Bass Patent Law, LLC | 57 | 5.0★ (12) | Frederick, 35 mi away | — | — |
| 6 | Gerben IP | 57 | 5.0★ (13) | Lancaster, 39 mi away | — | — |
| 7 | Finch & Associates, LLC | 56 | 4.6★ (9) | Silver Spring, 48 mi away | Sat · Evenings | — |
| 8 | Steve O'Donnell | 56 | 5.0★ (11) | Lancaster, 39 mi away | — | — |
| 9 | IP Consulting Group | 55 | 5.0★ (4) | Gaithersburg, 48 mi away | — | — |
| 10 | Bold Patents Law Firm | 53 | 5.0★ (3) | Columbia, 41 mi away | — | — |
Ordered by LFR Score, a 0–100 score from nine published factors. Paid placement never changes the order.
Ranked by our published LFR Score from public data, not by payment; a rank is not an endorsement or a prediction of results.
Ranked #1 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.8★ from 401 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Columbia, 39 mi away
Ranked #2 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 99 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Baltimore, 41 mi away
Ranked #3 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 7 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Baltimore, 41 mi away
Ranked #4 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.9★ from 84 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Frederick, 35 mi away
Ranked #5 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 12 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Lancaster, 39 mi away
Ranked #6 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 13 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Silver Spring, 48 mi away
Ranked #7 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.6★ from 9 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Lancaster, 39 mi away
Ranked #8 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 11 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Gaithersburg, 48 mi away
Ranked #9 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 4 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Intellectual property registry”.
Based on 6 of 9 factors; bar status, recency and availability not yet collected.
Based in Columbia, 41 mi away
Ranked #10 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 3 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Patent attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Harrisburg, 35 mi away
Ranked #11 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.9★ from 28 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Law firm”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Hanover
Ranked #12 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.3★ from 11 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in York, 18 mi away
Ranked #13 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.4★ from 17 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Lebanon, 48 mi away
Ranked #14 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 5 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Law firm”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Columbia, 43 mi away
Ranked #15 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 5.0★ from 9 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Family law attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Columbia, 44 mi away
Ranked #16 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.6★ from 11 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Bankruptcy attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Frederick, 35 mi away
Ranked #17 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.0★ from 4 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Bankruptcy attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Cockeysville, 32 mi away
Ranked #18 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 1.7★ from 7 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Bankruptcy attorney”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Lancaster, 40 mi away
Ranked #19 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 2.7★ from 7 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Law firm”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
Based in Gaithersburg, 49 mi away
Ranked #20 because of its Google rating and practice area focus: 4.5★ from 4 Google reviews, listed on Google as “Law firm”.
Based on 7 of 9 factors; bar status and recency not yet collected.
20 more intellectual property lawyers within 50 mi that we can't rank yet: too few reviews, or a practice area we couldn't confirm. Listed A to Z.
| Business | Google rating | Distance |
|---|---|---|
| Becker Law Group, P.C. | 4.8★ (63) | In Hanover |
| CGA Law Firm | 5.0★ (2) | In Hanover |
| Crabbs & Crabbs | 4.7★ (55) | In Hanover |
| Crabbs Muriel A | 3.7★ (3) | In Hanover |
| G. Steven McKonly, PC | 4.2★ (5) | In Hanover |
| Gates Rachel L | 5.0★ (3) | In Hanover |
| Guthrie, Nonemaker, Yingst & Hart, LLP | 3.0★ (2) | In Hanover |
| Handler Henning & Rosenberg LLC | 4.9★ (33) | In Hanover |
| Kalasnik Law Office LLC | 4.6★ (39) | In Hanover |
| KBG Injury Law | 4.6★ (14) | In Hanover |
| Larry W. Wolf | 4.3★ (7) | In Hanover |
| Mooney Law | 4.4★ (102) | In Hanover |
| Peterson & Peterson | 4.3★ (6) | In Hanover |
| Rebert Elinor A | 4.8★ (6) | In Hanover |
| Scott A. Ruth, Attorney at Law | 4.5★ (38) | In Hanover |
| Shultz Law Firm LLC | 1.0★ (1) | In Hanover |
| Siegle Law | 5.0★ (3) | In Hanover |
| Smith David C | 5.0★ (3) | In Hanover |
| Stetter Jennifer M | 5.0★ (1) | In Hanover |
| Strausbaugh Law | 4.7★ (53) | In Hanover |
We scored 20 Hanover intellectual property lawyers on nine factors, weighted as shown. A law firm is ranked when its practice area is confirmed and it has 3 or more Google reviews or a claimed profile. A law firm with no Google reviews scores zero on rating, review volume and recency. Other unknown factors are left out, not counted as zero. Scores last refreshed November 9, 2026.
Paid placement never changes a rank or score. Attorney advertising businesses are paid, labelled, limited to 3 and shown above the ranking, outside it.
| Factor | Weight | Computed from | In Hanover data |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reputation | 25% | Google star rating, adjusted for how many reviews back it | Measured |
| Bar status | 10% | An active bar or law society record matched to a lawyer at the firm (not measured until a record source is loaded) | Not yet collected |
| Review volume | 10% | Number of Google reviews, compared with the most-reviewed firm on the list | Measured |
| Recency | 10% | Share of reviews from the last 12 months | Not yet collected |
| Availability | 5% | Weekly office hours, Saturday, Sunday, and phones answered 24/7 | Measured |
| Practice focus | 15% | How clearly the firm practises this area (its Google category and name) | Measured |
| Proximity | 5% | An office in the city scores highest, less the farther away it is | Measured |
| Claimed profile | 10% | The firm has claimed its Law Firms Ranked profile (free and paid earn the same) | Measured |
| Law Firms Ranked reviews | 10% | Verified client reviews collected by Law Firms Ranked: their rating and how many there are | Measured |